Server IP : 66.29.132.122 / Your IP : 18.116.63.213 Web Server : LiteSpeed System : Linux business142.web-hosting.com 4.18.0-553.lve.el8.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon May 27 15:27:34 UTC 2024 x86_64 User : admazpex ( 531) PHP Version : 7.2.34 Disable Function : NONE MySQL : OFF | cURL : ON | WGET : ON | Perl : ON | Python : ON | Sudo : OFF | Pkexec : OFF Directory : /proc/self/root/proc/self/root/proc/thread-self/root/proc/thread-self/root/proc/thread-self/root/proc/thread-self/root/proc/self/root/opt/alt/openssl/share/man/man3/ |
Upload File : |
.\" Automatically generated by Pod::Man 4.11 (Pod::Simple 3.35) .\" .\" Standard preamble: .\" ======================================================================== .de Sp \" Vertical space (when we can't use .PP) .if t .sp .5v .if n .sp .. .de Vb \" Begin verbatim text .ft CW .nf .ne \\$1 .. .de Ve \" End verbatim text .ft R .fi .. .\" Set up some character translations and predefined strings. \*(-- will .\" give an unbreakable dash, \*(PI will give pi, \*(L" will give a left .\" double quote, and \*(R" will give a right double quote. \*(C+ will .\" give a nicer C++. Capital omega is used to do unbreakable dashes and .\" therefore won't be available. \*(C` and \*(C' expand to `' in nroff, .\" nothing in troff, for use with C<>. .tr \(*W- .ds C+ C\v'-.1v'\h'-1p'\s-2+\h'-1p'+\s0\v'.1v'\h'-1p' .ie n \{\ . ds -- \(*W- . ds PI pi . if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=24u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-12u'-\" diablo 10 pitch . if (\n(.H=4u)&(1m=20u) .ds -- \(*W\h'-12u'\(*W\h'-8u'-\" diablo 12 pitch . ds L" "" . ds R" "" . ds C` "" . ds C' "" 'br\} .el\{\ . ds -- \|\(em\| . ds PI \(*p . ds L" `` . ds R" '' . ds C` . ds C' 'br\} .\" .\" Escape single quotes in literal strings from groff's Unicode transform. .ie \n(.g .ds Aq \(aq .el .ds Aq ' .\" .\" If the F register is >0, we'll generate index entries on stderr for .\" titles (.TH), headers (.SH), subsections (.SS), items (.Ip), and index .\" entries marked with X<> in POD. Of course, you'll have to process the .\" output yourself in some meaningful fashion. .\" .\" Avoid warning from groff about undefined register 'F'. .de IX .. .nr rF 0 .if \n(.g .if rF .nr rF 1 .if (\n(rF:(\n(.g==0)) \{\ . if \nF \{\ . de IX . tm Index:\\$1\t\\n%\t"\\$2" .. . if !\nF==2 \{\ . nr % 0 . nr F 2 . \} . \} .\} .rr rF .\" .\" Accent mark definitions (@(#)ms.acc 1.5 88/02/08 SMI; from UCB 4.2). .\" Fear. Run. Save yourself. No user-serviceable parts. . \" fudge factors for nroff and troff .if n \{\ . ds #H 0 . ds #V .8m . ds #F .3m . ds #[ \f1 . ds #] \fP .\} .if t \{\ . ds #H ((1u-(\\\\n(.fu%2u))*.13m) . ds #V .6m . ds #F 0 . ds #[ \& . ds #] \& .\} . \" simple accents for nroff and troff .if n \{\ . ds ' \& . ds ` \& . ds ^ \& . ds , \& . ds ~ ~ . ds / .\} .if t \{\ . ds ' \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\'\h"|\\n:u" . ds ` \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\`\h'|\\n:u' . ds ^ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*10/11-\*(#H)'^\h'|\\n:u' . ds , \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10)',\h'|\\n:u' . ds ~ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu-\*(#H-.1m)'~\h'|\\n:u' . ds / \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H)'\z\(sl\h'|\\n:u' .\} . \" troff and (daisy-wheel) nroff accents .ds : \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*8/10-\*(#H+.1m+\*(#F)'\v'-\*(#V'\z.\h'.2m+\*(#F'.\h'|\\n:u'\v'\*(#V' .ds 8 \h'\*(#H'\(*b\h'-\*(#H' .ds o \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu+\w'\(de'u-\*(#H)/2u'\v'-.3n'\*(#[\z\(de\v'.3n'\h'|\\n:u'\*(#] .ds d- \h'\*(#H'\(pd\h'-\w'~'u'\v'-.25m'\f2\(hy\fP\v'.25m'\h'-\*(#H' .ds D- D\\k:\h'-\w'D'u'\v'-.11m'\z\(hy\v'.11m'\h'|\\n:u' .ds th \*(#[\v'.3m'\s+1I\s-1\v'-.3m'\h'-(\w'I'u*2/3)'\s-1o\s+1\*(#] .ds Th \*(#[\s+2I\s-2\h'-\w'I'u*3/5'\v'-.3m'o\v'.3m'\*(#] .ds ae a\h'-(\w'a'u*4/10)'e .ds Ae A\h'-(\w'A'u*4/10)'E . \" corrections for vroff .if v .ds ~ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*9/10-\*(#H)'\s-2\u~\d\s+2\h'|\\n:u' .if v .ds ^ \\k:\h'-(\\n(.wu*10/11-\*(#H)'\v'-.4m'^\v'.4m'\h'|\\n:u' . \" for low resolution devices (crt and lpr) .if \n(.H>23 .if \n(.V>19 \ \{\ . ds : e . ds 8 ss . ds o a . ds d- d\h'-1'\(ga . ds D- D\h'-1'\(hy . ds th \o'bp' . ds Th \o'LP' . ds ae ae . ds Ae AE .\} .rm #[ #] #H #V #F C .\" ======================================================================== .\" .IX Title "rand 3" .TH rand 3 "2019-12-20" "1.0.2u" "OpenSSL" .\" For nroff, turn off justification. Always turn off hyphenation; it makes .\" way too many mistakes in technical documents. .if n .ad l .nh .SH "NAME" rand \- pseudo\-random number generator .SH "SYNOPSIS" .IX Header "SYNOPSIS" .Vb 1 \& #include <openssl/rand.h> \& \& int RAND_set_rand_engine(ENGINE *engine); \& \& int RAND_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num); \& int RAND_pseudo_bytes(unsigned char *buf, int num); \& \& void RAND_seed(const void *buf, int num); \& void RAND_add(const void *buf, int num, double entropy); \& int RAND_status(void); \& \& int RAND_load_file(const char *file, long max_bytes); \& int RAND_write_file(const char *file); \& const char *RAND_file_name(char *file, size_t num); \& \& int RAND_egd(const char *path); \& \& void RAND_set_rand_method(const RAND_METHOD *meth); \& const RAND_METHOD *RAND_get_rand_method(void); \& RAND_METHOD *RAND_SSLeay(void); \& \& void RAND_cleanup(void); \& \& /* For Win32 only */ \& void RAND_screen(void); \& int RAND_event(UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM); .Ve .SH "DESCRIPTION" .IX Header "DESCRIPTION" Since the introduction of the \s-1ENGINE API,\s0 the recommended way of controlling default implementations is by using the \s-1ENGINE API\s0 functions. The default \&\fB\s-1RAND_METHOD\s0\fR, as set by \fBRAND_set_rand_method()\fR and returned by \&\fBRAND_get_rand_method()\fR, is only used if no \s-1ENGINE\s0 has been set as the default \&\*(L"rand\*(R" implementation. Hence, these two functions are no longer the recommended way to control defaults. .PP If an alternative \fB\s-1RAND_METHOD\s0\fR implementation is being used (either set directly or as provided by an \s-1ENGINE\s0 module), then it is entirely responsible for the generation and management of a cryptographically secure \s-1PRNG\s0 stream. The mechanisms described below relate solely to the software \s-1PRNG\s0 implementation built in to OpenSSL and used by default. .PP These functions implement a cryptographically secure pseudo-random number generator (\s-1PRNG\s0). It is used by other library functions for example to generate random keys, and applications can use it when they need randomness. .PP A cryptographic \s-1PRNG\s0 must be seeded with unpredictable data such as mouse movements or keys pressed at random by the user. This is described in \fBRAND_add\fR\|(3). Its state can be saved in a seed file (see \fBRAND_load_file\fR\|(3)) to avoid having to go through the seeding process whenever the application is started. .PP \&\fBRAND_bytes\fR\|(3) describes how to obtain random data from the \&\s-1PRNG.\s0 .SH "INTERNALS" .IX Header "INTERNALS" The \fBRAND_SSLeay()\fR method implements a \s-1PRNG\s0 based on a cryptographic hash function. .PP The following description of its design is based on the SSLeay documentation: .PP First up I will state the things I believe I need for a good \s-1RNG.\s0 .IP "1." 4 A good hashing algorithm to mix things up and to convert the \s-1RNG\s0 'state' to random numbers. .IP "2." 4 An initial source of random 'state'. .IP "3." 4 The state should be very large. If the \s-1RNG\s0 is being used to generate 4096 bit \s-1RSA\s0 keys, 2 2048 bit random strings are required (at a minimum). If your \s-1RNG\s0 state only has 128 bits, you are obviously limiting the search space to 128 bits, not 2048. I'm probably getting a little carried away on this last point but it does indicate that it may not be a bad idea to keep quite a lot of \s-1RNG\s0 state. It should be easier to break a cipher than guess the \s-1RNG\s0 seed data. .IP "4." 4 Any \s-1RNG\s0 seed data should influence all subsequent random numbers generated. This implies that any random seed data entered will have an influence on all subsequent random numbers generated. .IP "5." 4 When using data to seed the \s-1RNG\s0 state, the data used should not be extractable from the \s-1RNG\s0 state. I believe this should be a requirement because one possible source of 'secret' semi random data would be a private key or a password. This data must not be disclosed by either subsequent random numbers or a \&'core' dump left by a program crash. .IP "6." 4 Given the same initial 'state', 2 systems should deviate in their \s-1RNG\s0 state (and hence the random numbers generated) over time if at all possible. .IP "7." 4 Given the random number output stream, it should not be possible to determine the \s-1RNG\s0 state or the next random number. .PP The algorithm is as follows. .PP There is global state made up of a 1023 byte buffer (the 'state'), a working hash value ('md'), and a counter ('count'). .PP Whenever seed data is added, it is inserted into the 'state' as follows. .PP The input is chopped up into units of 20 bytes (or less for the last block). Each of these blocks is run through the hash function as follows: The data passed to the hash function is the current 'md', the same number of bytes from the 'state' (the location determined by in incremented looping index) as the current 'block', the new key data 'block', and 'count' (which is incremented after each use). The result of this is kept in 'md' and also xored into the \&'state' at the same locations that were used as input into the hash function. I believe this system addresses points 1 (hash function; currently \&\s-1SHA\-1\s0), 3 (the 'state'), 4 (via the 'md'), 5 (by the use of a hash function and xor). .PP When bytes are extracted from the \s-1RNG,\s0 the following process is used. For each group of 10 bytes (or less), we do the following: .PP Input into the hash function the local 'md' (which is initialized from the global 'md' before any bytes are generated), the bytes that are to be overwritten by the random bytes, and bytes from the 'state' (incrementing looping index). From this digest output (which is kept in 'md'), the top (up to) 10 bytes are returned to the caller and the bottom 10 bytes are xored into the 'state'. .PP Finally, after we have finished 'num' random bytes for the caller, \&'count' (which is incremented) and the local and global 'md' are fed into the hash function and the results are kept in the global 'md'. .PP I believe the above addressed points 1 (use of \s-1SHA\-1\s0), 6 (by hashing into the 'state' the 'old' data from the caller that is about to be overwritten) and 7 (by not using the 10 bytes given to the caller to update the 'state', but they are used to update 'md'). .PP So of the points raised, only 2 is not addressed (but see \&\fBRAND_add\fR\|(3)). .SH "SEE ALSO" .IX Header "SEE ALSO" \&\fBBN_rand\fR\|(3), \fBRAND_add\fR\|(3), \&\fBRAND_load_file\fR\|(3), \fBRAND_egd\fR\|(3), \&\fBRAND_bytes\fR\|(3), \&\fBRAND_set_rand_method\fR\|(3), \&\fBRAND_cleanup\fR\|(3)